| You just used a magnifying glass and light. Yes. And it took you five hours plus for each item, is that right? Well, I would identify, write up notes, and re-identify just to be absolutely sure. What were you looking for, then? I was looking for the presence or absence of Haversian canals. Perhaps you'd explain that to the court. Haversian canals are canals or pits that are apparent if this specimen is in fact bone. But you need a magnifying glass to see that? You do. So, my client, if he picked up an object wouldn't be able to see that, would he? No, he would be able to see it. You've just told us it takes five or six hours to analyse each item. Yes, but I was doing other work. My client's liberty is at stake here. Yes, I understand. And I think that you are biased in this, that you looked for what you wanted to see. Er, no. My task and my area of expertise is to identify between ivory and bone. And that's the end of the story as far as you're concerned, is it? It is sufficient and, it is sufficient in my estimation, yeah. Sounds rather incredible, doesn't it? It does, we're very good at what we do. | |
| 你只用了放大镜和灯 -对 -每件证物花费了五个多小时，对吗？ 我需要鉴定，做记录。 再次鉴定以确定你要找的是什么？ 我要鉴定出是否有哈弗斯管 能否为法庭解释一下如果样品有哈弗斯管或哈弗斯凹点，那就能确定是骨头，但需要用放大镜才能看到 -对 这么说，我的当事人是没有办法拿起来凭肉眼就能分辨出的，是吗？ 他应该能分辨出，但你刚刚说每一件证物你都需要花费五六个小时来鉴定？ 是的，但我同时还在做其他工作... 现在事关我当事人的自由 我明白，我认为在这一点上你有所偏颇，你只看到了你想看到的一面。 不是这样的 我的工作和我的专业，就是区分象牙和骨头，而你所关心的就只有这一点 ，对吗？ 这一点 这一点足够我做出判断了 听起来不太可信，不是吗？ 的确，但我们很专业。 |
| You just used a magnifying glass and light. Yes. And it took you five hours plus for each item, is that right? Well, I would identify, write up notes, and reidentify just to be absolutely sure. What were you looking for, then? I was looking for the presence or absence of Haversian canals. Perhaps you' d explain that to the court. Haversian canals are canals or pits that are apparent if this specimen is in fact bone. But you need a magnifying glass to see that? You do. So, my client, if he picked up an object wouldn' t be able to see that, would he? No, he would be able to see it. You' ve just told us it takes five or six hours to analyse each item. Yes, but I was doing other work. My client' s liberty is at stake here. Yes, I understand. And I think that you are biased in this, that you looked for what you wanted to see. Er, no. My task and my area of expertise is to identify between ivory and bone. And that' s the end of the story as far as you' re concerned, is it? It is sufficient and, it is sufficient in my estimation, yeah. Sounds rather incredible, doesn' t it? It does, we' re very good at what we do. | |
| ni zhi yong le fang da jing he deng dui mei jian zheng wu hua fei le wu ge duo xiao shi, dui ma? wo xu yao jian ding, zuo ji lu. zai ci jian ding yi que ding ni yao zhao de shi shen me? wo yao jian ding chu shi fou you ha fu si guan neng fou wei fa ting jie shi yi xia ru guo yang pin you ha fu si guan huo ha fu si ao dian, na jiu neng que ding shi gu tou, dan xu yao yong fang da jing cai neng kan dao dui zhe me shuo, wo di dang shi ren shi mei you ban fa na qi lai ping rou yan jiu neng fen bian chu de, shi ma? ta ying gai neng fen bian chu, dan ni gang gang shuo mei yi jian zheng wu ni dou xu yao hua fei wu liu ge xiao shi lai jian ding? shi de, dan wo tong shi hai zai zuo qi ta gong zuo... xian zai shi guan wo dang shi ren de zi you wo ming bai, wo ren wei zai zhe yi dian shang ni you suo pian po, ni zhi kan dao le ni xiang kan dao de yi mian. bu shi zhe yang de wo de gong zuo he wo de zhuan ye, jiu shi qu fen xiang ya he gu tou, er ni suo guan xin de jiu zhi you zhe yi dian , dui ma? zhe yi dian zhe yi dian zu gou wo zuo chu pan duan le ting qi lai bu tai ke xin, bu shi ma? di que, dan wo men hen zhuan ye. |
| You just used a magnifying glass and light. Yes. And it took you five hours plus for each item, is that right? Well, I would identify, write up notes, and reidentify just to be absolutely sure. What were you looking for, then? I was looking for the presence or absence of Haversian canals. Perhaps you' d explain that to the court. Haversian canals are canals or pits that are apparent if this specimen is in fact bone. But you need a magnifying glass to see that? You do. So, my client, if he picked up an object wouldn' t be able to see that, would he? No, he would be able to see it. You' ve just told us it takes five or six hours to analyse each item. Yes, but I was doing other work. My client' s liberty is at stake here. Yes, I understand. And I think that you are biased in this, that you looked for what you wanted to see. Er, no. My task and my area of expertise is to identify between ivory and bone. And that' s the end of the story as far as you' re concerned, is it? It is sufficient and, it is sufficient in my estimation, yeah. Sounds rather incredible, doesn' t it? It does, we' re very good at what we do. | |
| nǐ zhǐ yòng le fàng dà jìng hé dēng duì měi jiàn zhèng wù huā fèi le wǔ gè duō xiǎo shí, duì ma? wǒ xū yào jiàn dìng, zuò jì lù. zài cì jiàn dìng yǐ què dìng nǐ yào zhǎo de shì shén me? wǒ yào jiàn dìng chū shì fǒu yǒu hā fú sī guǎn néng fǒu wèi fǎ tíng jiě shì yī xià rú guǒ yàng pǐn yǒu hā fú sī guǎn huò hā fú sī āo diǎn, nà jiù néng què dìng shì gú tou, dàn xū yào yòng fàng dà jìng cái néng kàn dào duì zhè me shuō, wǒ dí dàng shì rén shì méi yǒu bàn fǎ ná qǐ lái píng ròu yǎn jiù néng fēn biàn chū de, shì ma? tā yīng gāi néng fēn biàn chū, dàn nǐ gāng gāng shuō měi yī jiàn zhèng wù nǐ dōu xū yào huā fèi wǔ liù ge xiǎo shí lái jiàn dìng? shì de, dàn wǒ tóng shí hái zài zuò qí tā gōng zuò... xiàn zài shì guān wǒ dāng shì rén de zì yóu wǒ míng bái, wǒ rèn wéi zài zhè yì diǎn shàng nǐ yǒu suǒ piān pō, nǐ zhǐ kàn dào le nǐ xiǎng kàn dào de yī miàn. bú shì zhè yàng de wǒ de gōng zuò hé wǒ de zhuān yè, jiù shì qū fēn xiàng yá hé gú tou, ér nǐ suǒ guān xīn de jiù zhǐ yǒu zhè yì diǎn , duì ma? zhè yì diǎn zhè yì diǎn zú gòu wǒ zuò chū pàn duàn le tīng qǐ lái bù tài kě xìn, bú shì ma? dí què, dàn wǒ men hěn zhuān yè. |
YouTube Results (More on YouTube)